Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/06/Category:Nude women, bare feet apparent, soles exposed

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Category:Nude women, bare feet apparent, soles exposed[edit]

System-search.svgSee also: Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/11/Category:Barefoot female, sole exposed.

Why do we need so detailed subcats for nude women cats? Probably because our archives are more than full with so many nude images or there is something more logical about all these sutile cats? IMHO we do not need this and many other similar cats. (BTW we also do not need "several" of those images, but that is another issue.) Delete or merge it somewhere. E4024 (talk) 22:56, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Delete - Category is overly specific and unneeded. Nosferattus (talk) 19:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete as per nom. Yann (talk) 18:51, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Category intersections like this serve no educational purpose, and the only way they serve a categorization purpose is for use as porn. Overly objectifying, downright objectionable on a site like this, delete. - Jmabel ! talk 18:55, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete as pointless intersection. If categorizing by body-part is appropriate at all (which is not clear!), then PETSCAN easily finds them (so this cat still isn't needed). DMacks (talk) 19:38, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Intersection of multiple categories and without a coordinate category Category: Nude men, bare feet apparent, soles exposed only appears to address non-educational needs (in other words, pornography). ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 15:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2020/06/Category:Nude_women,_bare_feet_apparent,_soles_exposed&oldid=721849464"