Commons:Featured picture candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcut
This project page in other languages:

Other featured candidates:

3D film 2.svg Media 

Skip to current candidates Skip to current candidates

Featured picture candidates

FPCandiateicon.svg

Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures.

Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 and current month.

For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election.

Formal things[edit]

Nominating[edit]

Guidelines for nominators[edit]

Please read the complete guidelines before nominating.

This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:

  • Licensing – Images licensed with solely "GFDL" or "GFDL and an NC-only license" are not acceptable due the restrictions placed on re-use by these licenses.
  • Resolution – Raster images of lower resolution than 2 million pixels (pixels, not bytes) are typically rejected unless there are strong mitigating reasons. This does not apply to vector graphics (SVGs).
    • Graphics on Commons are not only viewed on conventional computer screens. They may be used in high-resolution print versions, and the images may be cropped to focus on portions of the image. See Commons:Why we need high resolution media for more information.
  • Scans – While not official policy, Help:Scanning provides advice on the preparation of various types of images that may be useful.
  • General quality – pictures being nominated should be of high technical quality.
  • Digital manipulations must not deceive the viewer. Digital manipulation for the purpose of correcting flaws in an image is generally acceptable, provided it is limited, well-done, and not intended to deceive.
    • For photographs, typical acceptable manipulations include cropping, perspective correction, sharpening/blurring, and color/exposure correction. More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the {{Retouched picture}} template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable. For images made from more than one photo, you can use the {{Panorama}} or {{Focus stacked image}} templates.
    • For historic images, acceptable manipulations might include digitally fixing rips, removal of stains, cleanup of dirt, and, for mass-produced artworks such as engravings, removal of flaws inherent to the particular reproduction, such as over-inking. Careful color adjustments may be used to bring out the original work from the signs of ageing, though care should be taken to restore a natural appearance. The original artistic intent should be considered when deciding whether it is appropriate to make a change. Edits to historic material should be documented in detail within the file description, and an unedited version should be uploaded and cross linked for comparison.
  • Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others. Pictures should be in some way special, so please be aware that:
    • almost all sunsets are aesthetically pleasing, and most such pictures are not in essence different from others,
    • night-shots are pretty but normally more details can be shown on pictures taken at daytime,
    • beautiful does not always mean valuable.
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents[edit]

There are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject.

Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable.

Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself.

Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well.

Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:

  • Notable in its own right: Works by major artists, or works that are otherwise notable, such as the subjects of a controversy.
  • Of high artistic merit: Works which, while not particularly well known, are nonetheless wonderful examples of their particular type or school of art.
  • Of high historic merit: The historical method values very early illustrations of scenes and events over later ones. Hence, a work of poor quality depicting a contemporaneous historical event can be nonetheless important, even if the artistic merit is relatively low. Likewise, scans or photographs of important documents – which may not be at all artistic – nonetheless may be highly valuable if the documents are historically significant. The reason for the image's historical importance should be briefly stated in the nomination, for those reviewers unfamiliar with the subject.
  • Of high illustrative merit: Works that illustrate or help explain notable subjects, for instance, illustrations of books, scientific subjects, or technical processes. The amount of artistic merit required for these will vary by subject, but, for instance, an illustration that makes the working of a complicated piece of machinery very clear need not be notable as a piece of artwork as well, whereas an illustration for a book might well be expected to reach much higher artistic standards.

Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced."

Photographs[edit]

On the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.

  • Focus – every important object in the picture should normally be sharp.
  • Exposure refers to the shutter diaphragm combination that renders an image with a tonal curve that ideally is able to represent in acceptable detail shadows and highlights within the image. This is called latitude. Images can be on the low side of the tonal curve (low range), the middle (middle range) or high side (upper range). Lack of shadow detail is not necessarily a negative characteristic. In fact, it can be part of the desired effect. Burned highlights in large areas are a distracting element.
  • Composition refers to the arrangement of the elements within the image. The "Rule of thirds" is one useful guideline. Horizons should almost never be placed in the middle, where they "cut" the image in half. Often, a horizon creating a top or bottom third of the space works better. The main idea is to use space to create a dynamic image.
    • Foreground and background – foreground and background objects may be distracting. You should check that something in front of the subject doesn't hide important elements and that something in background doesn't spoil the composition (for example that the streetlight doesn't "stand" on someone's head).
  • Movement control refers to the manner in which motion is represented in the image. Motion can be frozen or blurred. Neither one is better than the other. It is the intention of representation. Movement is relative within the objects of the image. For example, photographing a race car that appears frozen in relation to the background does not give us a sense of speed or motion, so technique dictates to represent the car in a frozen manner but with a blurred background, thus creating the sense of motion, this is called "panning". On the other hand, representing a basketball player in a high jump frozen in relation to everything else, due to the "unnatural" nature of the pose would be a good photograph.
  • Depth of field (DOF) refers to the area in focus in front of and beyond main subject. Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture. Large or small DOF can either way add or subtract to the quality of the image. Low depth of field can be used to bring attention to the main subject, separating it from the general environment. High depth of field can be used to emphasize space. Short focal length lenses (wide angles) yield large DOF, and vice versa, long focal lenses (telephotos) have shallow DOF. Small apertures yield large DOF and conversely, large apertures yield shallow DOF.

On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.

  • Shape refers to the contour of the main subjects.
  • Volume refers to the three dimensional quality of the object. This is accomplished using side light. Contrary to general belief, front lighting is not the best light. It tends to flatten subject. Best light of day is early morning or late afternoon.
  • Color is important. Oversaturated colors are not good.
  • Texture refers to the quality of the surface of the subject. It is enhanced by side lighting… it is the "feel" to the touch.
  • Perspective refers to the "angle" accompanied by lines that disappear into a vanishing point that may or may not be inside the image.
  • Balance refers to the arrangement of subjects within the image that can either give equal weight or appear to be heavier on one side.
  • Proportion refers to the relation of size of objects in picture. Generally, we tend to represent small objects small in relation to others, but a good technique is to represent small objects large contrary to natural size relationship. For example, a small flower is given preponderance over a large mountain…. This is called inversion of scales.
Not all elements must be present. Some photographs can be judged on individual characteristics, that is, an image can be about color or texture, or color AND texture, etc.
  • Noise refers to unwanted corruption of color brightness and quality and can be caused by underexposure. It is not a desirable quality and can be grounds for opposition.
  • Symbolic meaning or relevance … Opinion wars can begin here … A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph.
Images can be culturally biased by the photographer and/or the observer. The meaning of the image should be judged according to the cultural context of the image, not by the cultural context of the observer. An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations …

You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating.

Video and audio[edit]

Please nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates.

Set nominations[edit]

If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:

  • Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set. Examples: pages in a pamphlet, crops (puzzle pieces) of a prohibitively large scan, a pair of pendant paintings. Not acceptable: Arbitrary selection of sample works by an artist.
  • A sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same).
  • A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible. Examples: Exterior and interior of a building, different facades of a building, different interior views, obverse and inverse of a banknote/coin. Not acceptable: A selection of different rooms in a skyscraper, the facade of a church plus an organ, any images of fundamentally different scopes.
  • A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object. Examples: Male and female versions of an animal (preferably in the same setting), all known species of a genus. Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats (unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that).

Simple tutorial for new users[edit]

Tutorial: Nominate on COM:FPC
How to nominate in 8 simple steps

STEP 1

  • STEP 1

    STEP 1


STEP 2

  • STEP 2

    STEP 2


STEP 3

  • STEP 3

    STEP 3


STEP 4

  • STEP 4

    STEP 4


STEP 5

  • STEP 5

    STEP 5


STEP 6

  • STEP 6

    STEP 6


STEP 7

  • STEP 7

    STEP 7


STEP 8

  • STEP 8 (last step)

    STEP 8 (last step)

NOTE: You don't need to worry if you are not sure, other users will try their best to help you.

Adding a new nomination[edit]

If you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following.

Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button.

All single files:

For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2

All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".


Step 2: follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save that page.

Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg}}

Strongly recommended: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports

Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using {{subst:FPC-notice|Your image filename.jpg}} -- ~~~~.

Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters.

Voting[edit]

Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed.

You may use the following templates:

  • {{Support}} (Symbol support vote.svg Support),
  • {{Oppose}} (Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose),
  • {{Neutral}} (Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral),
  • {{Comment}} (Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment),
  • {{Info}} (Pictogram voting info.svg Info),
  • {{Question}} (Pictogram-voting question.svg Question),
  • {{Request}} (Pictogram voting question-blue.svg Request).

You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.

A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above.

Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:

  • No reason
  • "I don't like it" and other empty assessments
  • "You can do better" and other criticisms of the author/nominator rather than the image

Remember also to put your signature (~~~~).

Featured picture delisting candidates[edit]

Over time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep It deserves to remain a featured picture
{{Delist}} Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist It does not deserve to be a featured picture anymore.

This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:

Text to use Displays as Meaning
{{Keep}} Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Do not replace the old image with the new image as a FP.
{{Delistandreplace}} Symbol redirect vote.svg Delist and replace Replace the current FP with the proposed replacement.

If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box:


In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:

  • Information on the origin of the image (creator, uploader);
  • A link to the original FP nomination (it will appear under "Links" on the image description page);
  • Your reasons for nominating the image and your username.

After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose.

Featured picture candidate policy[edit]

General rules[edit]

  1. The voting period is 9 complete days counted from the nomination. After the end of this period the result will be determined. Votes added on day 10 and after are not counted.
  2. Nominations by anonymous contributors are welcome
  3. Contributions to discussion by anonymous contributors are welcome
  4. Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Exception: registered users can always vote in their own nominations no matter the account age and number of edits.
  5. Nominations do not count as votes. Support must be explicitly stated.
  6. Nominators and authors can withdraw their nominated pictures at any time. This is done by adding the following template: {{Withdraw}} ~~~~. Also, remember that if more than one version is nominated, you should explicitly state which version you are withdrawing.
  7. Remember, the goal of the Wikimedia Commons project is to provide a central repository for free images to be used by all Wikimedia projects, including possible future projects. This is not simply a repository for Wikipedia images, so images should not be judged here on their suitability for that project.
  8. Rules of the 5th day based on vote counts on day number 5 (day of nomination + 5)
    1. Pictures are speedy declined if they have no support (apart from the nominator).
    2. Pictures are speedy promoted if they have 10 support votes or more and no oppose votes. (Note that if it takes more than five days to reach this threshold, the picture can be promoted as soon as it is reached.)
    3. Once either speedy criterion is reached, the voting period is considered closed, and no more votes may be added.
  9. Pictures tagged {{FPX}} may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied, provided there are no support votes other than that of the nominator.
  10. Pictures tagged {{FPD}} (FP-Denied) may be removed from the list 24 hours after the tag was applied.
  11. Only two active nominations by the same user (that is, nominations under review and not yet closed) are allowed. The main purpose of this measure is to contribute to a better average quality of nominations, by driving nominators/creators to choose carefully the pictures presented to the forum.

Featuring and delisting rules[edit]

A candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:

  1. Appropriate license (of course)
  2. At least seven Symbol support vote.svg Support votes (or 7 Symbol oppose vote.svg Delist votes for a delist) at the end of nine days
  3. Ratio of supporting/opposing votes at least 2/1 (a two-thirds majority); same for delist/keep votes
  4. Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured, but only the one with higher level of support, as determined by the closer. Whenever the closer is not sure which version has consensus to be featured, they should attempt to contact the voters to clarify their opinions if not clear from the nomination page.

The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. There is also a limit of two active delisting nominations per user, which is in addition to the limit of two active regular nominations.

The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules.

Above all, be polite[edit]

Please don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care.

Happy judging… and remember... all rules can be broken.

See also[edit]

Table of contents[edit]

List may contain works considered Not Safe for Work (nudity).

Nominators are requested, out of courtesy, to include the {{Nsfw}} template with such images. Users may select the gadget in user preferences "Deferred display of images tagged with {{Nsfw}} on COM:FPC" to enable the template's effect of hiding the image until selected.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Portal, Pitam Niwas Chowk, City Palace, Jaipur, 20191218 1000 9059.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2023 at 10:43:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Leheriya Gate at the City Palace, Jaipur

File:Australian House of Representatives - Parliament of Australia.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2023 at 10:09:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The House of Representatives in the Parliament House of Australia, Canberra

File:Олень з кленовим листком.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2023 at 16:11:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cervus nippon in Ternopil Oblast

File:Ранковий туман над пагорбами.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2023 at 16:06:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Shyshkovi horby

File:Spotted-backed weaver (Ploceus cucullatus spilonotus) male Mauritius.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2023 at 10:33:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spotted-backed weaver (Ploceus cucullatus spilonotus) male Mauritius

File:Iglesia de San Ignacio de Loyola, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-15, DD 27-29 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2023 at 09:13:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Ignatius of Loyola, Rome, Italy

File:Iglesia del Gesù, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-16, DD 109-111 HDR.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2023 at 09:12:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Gesù, Rome, Italy

File:Eugène Delacroix - La liberté guidant le peuple.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2023 at 02:12:30
SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Sadko.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2023 at 01:41:17
SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Saint-Charles Cemetery 05.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2023 at 22:34:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint-Charles Cemetery
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Canada
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Although it may seem incredible, the image is not in black and white. The surrounding fog and mist, characteristic of the winter weather this year, give this cemetery in Quebec an eerily cinematic feel, as if it were straight out of a horror movie. The bleak, monochromatic scene is made all the more haunting by the knowledge that it is a place of rest for the dead. Yet despite the eerie atmosphere, there is a sense of peace and solitude that pervades the cemetery, a reminder that even in death, we are not alone.All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Yann (talk) 16:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I love the atmosphere of this photo: on the one hand it is somewhat gloomy, on the other hand peaceful, just as you say. – Just one hint: Some of the inscriptions on the gravestones seem sharper than the gravestones themselves; this is a bit irritating. If you have applied any additional sharpening to the inscriptions, I would reduce/remove it, IHMO the inscriptions should be just as sharp/unsharp as the stones. --Aristeas (talk) 17:26, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Alla fonte.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2023 at 19:45:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Goats in the Monti Sibillini National Park
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Mauro Oldmen - uploaded by Mauro Oldmen - nominated by Civvì -- Civvì (talk) 19:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Civvì (talk) 19:45, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice photo, but very small and with no EXIF. Small photos with no EXIF are routinely successfully nominated for deletion as likely copyright violation, and I don't see how we could even consider promoting one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    @Ikan Kekek: It depends a lot on the circumstance. Here, we have two images of similar subjects with the same resolution, and together they tell a plausible story of how they could be own work as claimed. Also, it is a photo of nature rather than a person (which is much more likely to be a copyvio). Overall, I find the probability of a successful deletion nomination to be low. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:41, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Thanks for that. But even so, could you imagine featuring a photo under such circumstances? Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:53, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination It's a WLE picture, I'll contact the uploader to ask for a better version with all the data. Thanks. --Civvì (talk) 12:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Musee du Piano in Limoux (1).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2023 at 11:47:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rose windows of the Musée du Piano in Limoux, Aude, France

File:St John the Baptist church in Calmont (7).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2023 at 11:43:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint John the Baptist church in Calmont, Aveyron, France

File:Palmenhaus Schönbrunn at Schönbrunn Palace in Vienna, Austria-oblique PNr°1000.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2023 at 10:25:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Palmenhaus Schönbrunn (palm house Schönbrunn) at Schönbrunn Palace in Vienna, Austria

File:Neckargerach - Mittelberg - Westhang an Oktoberabend.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2023 at 10:08:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Landschaftsschutzgebiet

File:Cucumis metuliferus fruit cross section.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2023 at 10:03:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

African horned cucumber

File:Mauritius fody (Foudia rubra) male.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2023 at 13:05:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mauritius fody (Foudia rubra) male.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info An endangered bird endemic to Mauritius. A wild bird that has been ringed as part of a successful conservation plan. One FP of a close relation, the Madagascar fody. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:05, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:05, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 16:23, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Oversharpened. While perhaps not as familiar as the signs of traditional sharpening overuse ("wormy" fine details, increased noise in smooth areas), the cues of an AI sharpening algorithm going overboard are equally discernible: artificial fine detail (e.g., breast feathers), artifacts in slightly out-of-focus areas (e.g., tail, foreground wing, branch), and masking halos in transitions (e.g., background wing). Charles, I understand your point that the "right" amount of sharpening is somewhat subjective, but I think there are objective reasons to err on the side of caution. An under-sharpened image can always be sharpened further by the user without requiring access to the original Raw file (some software even does this automatically e.g. printing applications), but an over-sharpened photograph is irrecoverable. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:08, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above and the wing in the center is oof. -- Ivar (talk) 10:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pictogram voting delete.svg I withdraw my nomination Can't do anything about the oof wing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Horbachpark - Ettlingen 05.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2023 at 11:58:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Part of the „Wasserfenster und Kanzel” by Hans Peter Reuter (1988), Horbachpark, Ettlingen

File:Tartu asv2022-04 img28 StPaul Church.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2023 at 23:54:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St. Paul's Church, Tartu
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I like the church but don't find the composition exceptional, although it's a nice slice of life. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Aerial view of Olympic Stadium of Montreal.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2023 at 20:55:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial view of Olympic Stadium of Montreal

File:Cyrtomium falcatum 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2023 at 13:23:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sore of a fern
  • Screen settings which make the lines show up on this photo only? That would be a neat trick, don't you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral until we get an explanation or correction of these lines. Daniel Case (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    You see some lines you too? ----Abalg (talk) 10:19, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose There are lines; but rejected as this looks like a poor quality focus stack (lots of blurred areas) with extensive poorly-executed cloning top right. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:44, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cimitero Austro Ungarico Squarci di Luce.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2023 at 13:09:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Austro Hungarian military cemetery in Verona (Veneto, Italy). Black and white.
  • Sorry, I've withdrawn one of the other two candidatures. --Yiyi (Dimmi!) 10:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Mole Antonelliana di sera.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2023 at 12:58:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mole Antonelliana in Turin by night. Alps in the background.

File:Dülmen, Heilig-Kreuz-Kirche, The Cast Whale Project -- 2022 -- 0624.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2023 at 12:38:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Detail shot (humpback whale throat furrows) of art project “The Cast Whale Project” (Gil Shachar) in the Holy Cross Church in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

File:Himalayas, Nepal.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2023 at 10:45:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View to the east from Cho La Pass. Nepal, Himalayas.

File:Kleine kaaszwam (Skeletocutis nivea). 09-12-2022. (d.j.b.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2023 at 07:58:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Skeletocutis nivea on a dead twig. Focus stack of 55 photos.
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support Some haloing and light ringing around the broken twig. Daniel Case (talk) 18:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • ✓ Done. Light noise reduction and refinement. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Good closeup and nice details. What is causing the shiny little white blotches on the upper left? Is that just how part of the fungus looks? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:24, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Thank you for your question: all white dots on the fracture surface of the twig is the beginning of mold and will continue to grow. It's all still tiny. If you see such a small twig in nature, you can easily pass it by. --Famberhorst (talk) 06:09, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Indeed. It's very easy not to notice interesting things that are 21 mm in diameter. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:35, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Seattle (WA, USA), Pier 66 -- 2022 -- 1792.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2023 at 10:48:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tower with number of Pier 66 in Seattle, Washington, USA

File:Christmas Island Red Crab.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2023 at 01:43:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gecarcoidea natalis in Christmas Island National Park, Christmas Island
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 10:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Timetable (day 5 after nomination)[edit]

Thu 29 Dec → Tue 03 Jan
Fri 30 Dec → Wed 04 Jan
Sat 31 Dec → Thu 05 Jan
Sun 01 Jan → Fri 06 Jan
Mon 02 Jan → Sat 07 Jan
Tue 03 Jan → Sun 08 Jan

Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)[edit]

Sun 25 Dec → Tue 03 Jan
Mon 26 Dec → Wed 04 Jan
Tue 27 Dec → Thu 05 Jan
Wed 28 Dec → Fri 06 Jan
Thu 29 Dec → Sat 07 Jan
Fri 30 Dec → Sun 08 Jan
Sat 31 Dec → Mon 09 Jan
Sun 01 Jan → Tue 10 Jan
Mon 02 Jan → Wed 11 Jan
Tue 03 Jan → Thu 12 Jan

Closing a featured picture promotion request[edit]

The bot[edit]

Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.

Manual procedure[edit]

Any experienced user may close requests.

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}}
     (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    featured or not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. If it is featured:
    • Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
    • Also add the picture to an appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images.
    • Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
      • If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
      • If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
    • Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
      • The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
      • You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
    • Add == FP promotion ==
      {{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
  5. As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/January 2023), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.

Closing a delisting request[edit]

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
    '''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
    (for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg)
  2. Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
    delisted or not delisted
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted ===
  3. Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/January 2023.
  4. If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
    1. Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
    2. Edit the picture's description as follows:
      1. Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
      2. Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night shots, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
      3. Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
    3. Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
  5. If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.

Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination[edit]

  1. In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
    In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
    {{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}}
  2. Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
    not featured
    For example:
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
    becomes
    === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured ===
  3. Save your edit.
  4. Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
    {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
    Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/January 2023), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates&oldid=722420451"