Commons:Requests for checkuser

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcuts: COM:CHECK • COM:RFCU • COM:SOCK

This is the place to request investigations of abuse of multiple accounts or of other circumstances that require use of checkuser privileges.

Requesting a check

These indicators are used by CheckUsers to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments.
Request completed
Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed Likely
Symbol version generic.svg Possilikely Symbol possible vote.svg Possible
Symbol unlikely.svg Unlikely Symbol unsupport vote.svg Inconclusive
Symbol unrelated.svg Unrelated Time2wait.svg Stale
Request declined
Declined Checkuser is not for fishing
Checkuser is not magic pixie dust. 8ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says
Cyberduck icon.png It looks like a duck to me Checkuser is not a crystal ball.
Information
Additional information needed Deferred to
 Doing… Pictogram voting info.svg Info

Please do not ask us to run checks without good reason; be aware of the following before requesting a check:

  1. Checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases; pursue other options first, such as posting on the administrator's noticeboard.
  2. Running a check will only be done to combat disruption on Commons, or as required to assist checkuser investigations on other Wikimedia wikis.
    • Valid reasons for running a check include, for example: vandalism where a block of the underlying IP or IP range is needed and suspected block evasion, vote-stacking, or other disruption where technical evidence would prevent or reduce further disruption.
  3. Evidence is required. When you request a check, you must include a rationale that demonstrates (e.g., by including diffs) what the disruption to the project is, and why you believe the accounts are related.
    • Requests to run a check without evidence or with ambiguous reasoning will result in delays or the request not being investigated.
  4. The privacy policy does not allow us to make a check that has the effect of revealing IP addresses.
  5. Requests to run a check on yourself will be declined.

Outcome

Responses will be brief in order to comply with Wikimedia privacy policy. Due to technical limitations, results are not always clear. Closed requests are archived after seven days.

Privacy concerns

If you feel that a checkuser request has led to a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy regarding yourself, please refer the case to the Ombuds commission.

If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please purge this page's cache.

To request a check:

Cases are created on subpages of Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case.

Creating a request
  • Insert the name of the suspected sockpuppeteer (the main account or puppetmaster, not the sockpuppet!) in the box below, leaving out the "User:" prefix. Do not remove the text in the box, add to the end only.
  • Please explain/justify the request by saying what it is you suspect and why it is important that the check be carried out. Indicate the usernames you suspect, using {{checkuser}}. Please do not use this template in the section header, as that makes it difficult to read the account names. Include the diffs or links required to support the request and reason for it.
  • There are people to assist you and help with maintenance of the page. Just ask for help on the admin noticeboard if you really are stuck, or take your best shot and note that you weren't completely sure of what to say.
  • If a case subpage already exists, edit the existing page instead, either adding to the currently open section (if the case is not yet archived) or adding a new section to the top using {{subst:Commons:Requests for checkuser/Inputbox/Sample}} (if the case has been archived). When editing an existing case, be sure to list/transclude the subpage here.
Example
If you want to request a checkuser on User:John Doe, enter the text Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/John Doe then click "Request a checkuser." You will be taken to a page where you can fill out the request. Please make your request there brief and concise.


Then transclude your subpage on the top of the list at Commons:Requests for checkuser and remove {{Checkuser requests to be listed}} from the top of the case subpage.

nothing found

Requests[edit]

Irisvalverde1[edit]

Suspected related users[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results[edit]

Reason: See Special:Undelete/File:Virginia_Fonseca.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:40, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]



Pandaroid[edit]

Suspected related users[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results[edit]

Reason: With reference to Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fenrk/Archive. These editors have been causing disruption in the topic area of Indian Oriental Orthodox churches (e.g., Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, Malankara Independent Syrian Church.) Numerous policy violations in article editing brought them to our attention, and they appear to have a Conflict of Interest and possibly Undisclosed Paid Editing, on behalf of these Church bodies in India. As for Commons, they have repeatedly uploaded copyrighted images for use in the English articles. The images are usually taken from Facebook pages or official websites, and the editors may indeed be working on behalf of the administrators of the pages, but these editors have not bothered to clear copyright permissions through normal Wikimedia channels.

  1. Pandaroid uploaded 5 copyrighted images which were all deleted.
  2. Oytrfu edit: extant MISC bishop image
  3. Fenrky never edited, but was nailed as a sock in the enwiki investigation. (Where the master is known as "Fenrk" which account was never created here on Commons.)
  4. Ls8anonymous has made 3 uploads all claimed as "own work" of MISC bishops.
  5. UserLs08, the latest arrival AFAICT, has uploaded 3 more claimed as "own work" in exactly the same vein.

As we say on enwiki, it looks like a duck quacking into a megaphone: all these users have exactly the same usage patterns and exactly the same disruption occurs here and on enwiki. We are continually cleaning up after them by reverting and deleting their media. They are chronically uncooperative with our processes. Please block them and establish precedent on disruption in the topic area of Indian Oriental Orthodox Churches. Elizium23 (talk) 04:31, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yuiyui2001[edit]

Suspected related users[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results[edit]

Reason: WP:DUCK per user behavior. Both accounts have uploaded fake versions of Philippine National Police insignias, which was done previously by blocked sock User:TGRSupra2022. IP was seen removing the deletion requests of the images the mentioned accounts have uploaded. Please note that this vandal's behavior is very similar on what the longterm en.wiki vandal User:Brianmagallano has been doing for several years. Please see the vandal's LTA entry in en.wiki. -WayKurat (talk) 03:25, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Mzzzs[edit]

Suspected related users[edit]

Rationale, discussion and results[edit]

Reason: All three users are uploading identical, copyrighted photographs of Argentine footballers, e.g. File:Miguel Ángel Russo Copa Libertadores 2007.jpg, apparent block evasion. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:16, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed --Krd 18:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Krd I believe Znkllls (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log is another sockpuppet. They’re uploading the same images and editing the same es-wiki articles as the other socks. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:37, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Jamás mi intención será vandilizar, amigo.
Solo quiero ayudar. Si arruiné el trabajo
algún bibliotecario, pido disculpas. Znkllls (talk) 04:48, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed --Krd 09:56, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Jamás mi intención será dañar el trabajo de otro bibliotecarios. Si eso provoqué, pido disculpas. Vkllas (talk) 05:14, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Krd: I added the poster above.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 05:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Artículo bueno.svg Confirmed --Krd 09:16, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

For older requests, please see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Archives