Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anas Khan Hindi.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anas Khan Hindi.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Uhai as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. Its is in use by enwp. DaB. (talk) 15:23, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

 Delete Selfie by a user with no constructive global contributions makes it eligible for F10 regardless of its use per COM:CSDF. User is a self-promoter on the English Wikipedia and the pages it's in use on are violations of English Wikipedia policy and eligible for U5 and/or G11 CSD criteria on that wiki. Uhai (talk) 02:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Update: User blocked on enwiki and pages deleted. Don't know why this was brought here instead of leaving the CSD tag on as this is an unequivocal F10 and a waste of time to have here. Uhai (talk) 06:45, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

@Uhai That’s a ridiculous interpretation of F10. It is titled Personal photos by non-contributors (emphasis added). Files that are legitimately in use are not personal photos. If the file is not legitimately in use, just say that instead of arguing about F10. Brianjd (talk) 15:08, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

@Brianjd: That is a ridiculous interpretation of F10 since the criterion, as currently defined, states nothing about file use affecting speedy deletion eligibility. Your statement that "files that are legitimately in use are not personal photos" is also ridiculous since selfies are personal photos, in that they are photos of and made by oneself. If the policy is instead meant to mean "files uploaded for non-Wikimedia, personal use only" then the criterion's definition should be altered, with community consensus, to indicate as such. "Personal" can mean different things than "for personal use".

My comments about F10 were to inform the nominator that they erred in replacing the CSD nomination with this deletion request. Uhai (talk) 21:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

@Uhai I started a discussion at Commons:Village pump#Speedy deletion of in-scope files.

(Also, the previous analysis of F10 was incorrect: a user who uploaded an in-scope file has a constructive global contribution, so F10 does not apply. But that is a moot point now.) Brianjd (talk) 09:27, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Brianjd and Uhai, please refrain from using inflammatory wording, it hampers a factual discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 09:33, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

• Delete The user's only non-deleted contributions are a request to delete another image titled Commons:Deletion requests/File:This is a website logo.png. Is this the constructive global contribution you are pointing to? I don't need to see the image to guess it was part of the uploader's now-deleted spam pages. It is not in use anywhere and has zero educational value other than being used to spam. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 11:38, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

  @Ricky81682 I assume that Is this the constructive global contribution you are pointing to? is a reply to me. I did not say that the uploader has a constructive global contribution. I said that they would have had such a contribution if they had uploaded an in-scope file (important here because they did upload an in-use file, and in-use files are usually taken as in-scope until demonstrated otherwise), which we should remember for future CSD F10 cases. Brianjd (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

  I also said that it was a moot point, since the file has now been demonstrated to be out of scope. Brianjd (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

  So this should be deleted?It sounded like you were arguing they were a non-contributor. I mean it is possible that some major celebrity could upload a single personal photo and thus have an in-scope, in-use photographs with no constructive global contributions. Are you arguing this isn't a personal photo? Ricky81682 (talk) 11:49, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

  @Ricky81682 Uhai was arguing that the file was eligible for speedy deletion right from the start, before they commented here about why this file is out of scope, and the nominator should somehow have known that. I am saying that at that time, it was wrong to assume that the file was a personal photo, and therefore wrong to assume that F10 applied. Brianjd (talk) 12:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

---

Deleted: per nomination. Blocked on enwp, 12 edits on Commons (3 remaining after cleaning), not a Wikimedia contributor. --Yann (talk) 12:09, 30 December 2022 (UTC)