Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by David S. Soriano

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David S. Soriano (talk · contribs)[edit]

Personal artworks by uploader. Commons has a specific scope and is not a free webhosting service. Some artworks are also AI generated, which has its own copyright issues, as they are derivative works of numerous other works.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

These uploads have educational value and a number have been downloaded and used by viewers. Pattern recognition on these uploads will indicate they are quite original but certainly not ex anhilio, as only Cezanne and a few others can claim.
I used AI to generate crude drawings as a starting point and 95-99& of the creative work was done by me.
Growing numbers of artists are utilizing AI/ machine -learning, just as surgeons utilize robotics.
Most of these digital contributions are currently being painted , by me, and the uploads are for the benefit of viewers.
This is now the 2022 version of Fauvism, Impressionism and Post- Impressionism. David S. Soriano (talk) 03:10, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I neglected to mention that one watercolor was completed by me and uploaded for our users. D.S. David S. Soriano (talk) 03:13, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
One of my digital artwork designs ( all original) was recently used in a scientific paper on 'ibogaine' and 'depression'.
[1]https://bigthink.com/health/ibogaine-treatment/
I upload my work for allowing others to consider utilizing them for the common social good. David S. Soriano (talk) 03:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep You could probably argue images like File:Crayon Block (David Soriano).jpg are OOS and I'm sure others are. That said a good partition, maybe half, are fine. I dont' feel like going through or listing every single file that might or might not be in scope though. So my suggest would be that the nominator organizes them based on theme or something and re-nominates the that are clearly (at least close to it) OOS (it's not a bright line BTW). That said, there's no guideline that "user created artwork" is automatically OOS. As David S. Soriano showed in their last comment it can serve a purpose sometimes. I still think smaller batches of nominations would be worth doing though. We just impossible to evaluate every image on it's own merits when there's this many in a single nomination. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep most of these. Many of these artworks have potential educational uses. File:The Tugboat.png is a fairly good-quality illustration of a tugboat, and Category:Tugboats in art has only fifty items in it. File:The Female Cave Artist.png is one of the very few pictures on Commons showing stone-age cave painters at work. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete File:Tomatoes Or Grapes?.jpg, as it appears to be based on the copyrighted new Sun-Maid logo rather than the out-of-copyright original one. Chiolite (talk) 05:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kept: without prejudice to re-nomination per Adamant. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]