User talk:C.Suthorn

Roxy Reynolds —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.113.12.193 (talk) 04:56, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spuckstein.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used and useful, but the scope should tell more -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:31, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Chatting —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.116.126.219 (talk) 04:11, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Mein Körper, Meine Identität, Mein Leben!

Mein Körper, Meine Identität, Mein Leben! has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jotzet (talk) 15:18, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moltkebrücke in 3D 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 22:18, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Pictures from BoundCon

Regarding your recent comment about the pictures from BoundCon, see my original message at Commons:Deletion requests/Pictures from BoundCon:

I have asked the event staff about this back in 2013. The message I received is below: Solange keine Unbeteiligten, also Gäste zu erkennen sind, können Sie gerne Fotos von der BoundCon veröffentlichen... Andreas Voetterl

Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: (JIP) Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:52 PM To: info@boundcon.com Subject: Publizierung von Fotos Ich habe BoundCon X in Mai 2013 besucht und habe auch da Fotos von die Models gemacht. Darf ich die Fotos in WikiMedia Commons oder in ein Finnisches BDSM-Forum publizieren? Das Publizierung würde selbstverständlich komplett nichtkommerziell sein. Ein bezonderes Frage ist über dieses Foto von 13 Frauen in Handschellen bei einem Bondageshow von British Bondage. Ich habe es verstanden, daß nicht alle diese Frauen Models sind - manche sind ganz normale Besucher. Stimmt das? Und wenn das stimmt, darf ich das Foto trotzdem publizieren? Translation: As long as no non-involved people, that is to say guests, can be identified, you can gladly publish photos from BoundCon... Andreas Voetterl

Original message----- From: (JIP) Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:52 PM To: info@boundcon.com Subject: Publication of photos I have visited BoundCon X in May 2013 and have taken photos of the models. Am I allowed to publish the photos on WikiMedia Commons or on a Finnish BDSM forum? The publication would of course be completely non-commerical. A special question is about this photo of 13 women in handcuffs at a bondage show by British Bondage. I have understood that not all of these women are models - some are normal guests. Is this true? And if it is, am I still allowed to publish the photo? (Note: In the end, I never published the photo of 13 women in handcuffs.)

JIP (talk) 13:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi @JIP: OTRS will need this letter (send from the event host to OTRS-permissions). But there is a problem: the mail speaks about "non-commercial" (nc )use, but Commons needs a free (=commercial) license. It would certainly best if the host names a specific license (ie cc-by-sa-4.0) in their mail and if this was linked to the license text at creative-commons.org. --C.Suthorn (talk) 14:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

So what exactly should I ask the event host for? I'm kind of new to this OTRS thing. Could you give some sort of example request? JIP (talk) 15:16, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

COVID-19

Are you also for keep in this discussion: Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/03/Category:COVID-19 pandemic in Braunschweig ?

then mark it in bold to make it clear ;-)

Greets Triplec85 (talk) 14:10, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Kategorien

Hallo! Ich weiß, Sie melden gerne Leute bei ANU, ohne vorher Diskussion zu suchen, und werden wahrscheinlich auch diesmal das tun -- aber Regeln wie COM:OVERCAT gelten auch für Sie. Es kann nicht angehen, dass z.B. die Datei File:Venus Berlin 2019 024.jpg gleichzeitig in Kategorie "Femen at Venus Berlin 2019" einsortiert ist und in der Kategorie "Venus Berlin 2019", die ja zwingend daraus folgt. Also lassen Sie es so wie es ist, oder denken sich eine gänzlich andere Lösung aus. MfG --A.Savin 14:01, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

@A.Savin: Ich bin es wirklich leid. Ich trage eine große Zahl von - fast nur - selbst erstellten Medien bei. Sehr viele davon stammen von Motiven, bei denen es keine alternativen von anderen Quellen als mir gibt und auch nicht geben kann (beispielsweise diese Kategorie, weil hierzu eine Akkreditierung nötig war und niemand sonst sich diese Mühe gemacht hat). ZUdem ist gerade diese Kategorie von einer eher ssnsitiven Natur und ich gebe deswegen besonders hierauf acht. Dazu habe ich mir eine Struktur geschaffen, mit der ich arbeiten kann. Arbeiten kann obwohl von Zeit zu Zeit ein Bot vorbeikommt und mehrere Tausend der Dateien auf meiner Beo bearbeitet und damit die Watchlist überlaufen lässt. Arbeiten kann, obwohl immer wieder der UploadWizard bockt oder randomisierte SDC eingetragen werden. Bilder zur Abfckprämie werden einfach mal umbenannt und sehr allgemain kategorisiert, so dass die Einordnung zur Abfckprämie völlig verloren geht, aber dies geschieht dann noch nicht mal systematisch sondern für ein Bild von 30. Die Erstellung der Kategorie "Fake Funerals" habe ich zur Kenntnis genommen. Da bislang nur ausgewählte Bilder aus einer einzigen Kateogrie (die alle zum Fake Funeral gehören) enthalten sind, erschließt sich mir der Sinn nicht wirklich, aber ich störe mich auch nicht daran. Die Kategorienanordnung in Venus 2019 möchte ich aber bitte unangetastet sehen, da im Wesentlichen ich diese in ihrer Ordnung halte, sie auch sonst nicht für die Verwendung stört, und es mir das Leben erleichtert die Wartung zu machen. Daran etwas zu ändern ist einfach nur formalistisches Durchsetzen von Regeln, die dazu geschaffen wurden Übersichtlichkeit und Organisation sinnvoll zu verbessern, hier aber das Gegenteil bewirken. Wenn ich unterwegs bin und auf das Fotografieren auf Veranstaltungen angesprochen werde, versuche ich immer Werbung für das Mitmachen bei Wikipedia (vorallem das Hochladen von Bildern, insbesondere solche die ich leider nicht machen konnte) zu machen, aber im Grunde sind mir schon sämtliche Argumente ausgegangen. Commons verwendet ein völlig anderes und ungewohntes UI als jede andere Bilddatenbank, Bots nehmen Veränderungen die nicht immer richtig sind vor, und dann unwillig reagieren, Poweruser nehmen Regeln auf Punkt und Komma wenn ihnen das in den Kram passt und gehen darüber hinweg wenn nicht. Ich bemühe mich möglichst sinnvoll vorzugehen, und wenn ich merke, dass etwas nicht so toll ist oder darauf angesprochen werde, überlege ich mir etwas dazu. Gewöhnlich bekomme ich ein ping mit und reagiere wenn möglich auch zeitnah. Aber es ist einfach nicht nötig mir mit Kategorien (um die ich mich wirklich kümmere) zusätzliche unnötige Arbeit aufzubürden. Speziell die Venuskategorien habe ich (bei allen neueren bei Anlage) mit einem Template angelegt, dass die Persönlichkeitsrechte und die Veranstaltung mehrsprchig benennt und erlaubt nötigenfalls künftig weitere Hinweise einfach und ohne die Gefahr eines zu vergessen zu ergänzen. --C.Suthorn (talk) 16:16, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Ich habe weder mit Umbenennern noch mit Bots was zu tun. Und ich sehe nichts Schlechtes daran, zu Ihrer Akkreditierung eine User-Kategorie zu führen. Das ist hier gängige Praxis (Category:Wikimania 2016 photographs by Martin Kraft u.a.) --A.Savin 19:07, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

@A.Savin: Nein, es ist ja nie irgendjemand für etwas verantwortlich. Der Müll entsteht erst durch das intersektionelle Zusammenwirken. Ich habe eine User-kat, bzw mehrere. Und die folgen einem Schema und helfen mir bei meiner Arbeitsorganisation und Aussendarstellung, wenn ich bei einem Event nach einer Akkreditierung anfrage. Heute habe ich durch meine Kategorien gleich mehrere Copyvios (Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dannylove1) gefunden die diesem ganzen Commons-Durcheinander nicht aufgefallen sind, obwohl das ein Bot hätte entdecken können. Bei vorherigen Fällen habe ich das angesprochen (VP oder Forum), kümmert aber irgendwie niemand. Stattdesen muss ich erleben wie mir hier ganz unnötig die Arbeit erschwert wird. --C.Suthorn (talk) 11:57, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Da ich immernoch nicht verstehe, was das Ganze mit Category:Venus Berlin 2019 by C.Suthorn zu tun hat, bin ich hier raus. Falls Sie eine bessere Lösung haben, können Sie mich gerne anpingen, aber bei COM:OVERCAT bleibt es und ich sehe nicht, wieso für Sie eine Ausnahme gemacht werden sollte. MfG --A.Savin 12:59, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Spam auf Dateiseiten

Du hast bei vielen deiner Fotos "no caption, no cc-zero" als Caption hinzugefügt. Das ist offensichtlich Blödsinn, da es nichts mit dem Bild zu tun hat. Wenn du deine Meinung zu bestimmten Dingen ausdrücken willst nutze bitte User:C.Suthorn oder schreib ein Essay. Was als Caption stehen sollte wird hier beschrieben: Commons:File captions. Alles andere ist eine gezielte Störung des Projekts. --GPSLeo (talk) 08:50, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Auch die neuesten hochgeladenen Dateien enthalten immer noch diesen Spam. --GPSLeo (talk) 19:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Ich hab jetzt einen Bot-Lauf gestartet, um diese Captions zu entfernen (Edit Group). (Edit: Ist jetzt fertig.) --Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 21:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

@Lucas Werkmeister: Nein, das war kein Bot-Lauf, das war heftig disruptiv. Wenn Du ein Bot-Flag gesetzt hättest, hätte ich das aus der Beo filtern können, so aber nicht. Auch kein Tag zum Filtern der Beo. Keine Ahnung welche Edits an welchen Files auf meiner Beo ich nun nicht sehen konnte, da hast Du ganze Arbeit geleistet. --C.Suthorn (talk) 12:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, das war ungenau formuliert. Ich hätte die Edits auch z.B. mit QuickStatements machen können – meinen eigenen Code habe ich hauptsächlich geschrieben, um sicherzustellen, dass ich nicht aus Versehen eine nicht-unsinnige Beschreibung lösche, die jemand wider Erwarten hinzugefügt hat. Bot-Flag hätte ich aber so oder so nicht setzen können, da mir die entsprechende Berechtigung fehlt – und mein Verständnis ist, dass man für solche einmaligen Läufe mit QuickStatements, ACDC oder anderen Tools keine Bot-Anfrage braucht. Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	hello you do nice job ,jet keep going like that erramixx@gmail.com Ramiiiiiiiii (talk) 15:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:2020 (2nd) Cologne WNBR 01.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Köln Hauptbahnhof, Juli 2020 02 part 1 of 2.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Berlin Pride - Save our Community, Save our Pride 01 of 2.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Dyke March Cologne 2020 01 part 1 of 2.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Die Rotierende Schwibe - Spirale.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2020

Hallo C.Suthorn,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2020 findet zum zehnten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Obwohl es den Wettbewerb seit zehn Jahren gibt, sind immer noch viele Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Es haben sich auch Kulturdenkmale verändert, sie wurden saniert oder umgestaltet. Diese Entwicklung kann auch gezeigt werden. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab 5. September 2020 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams Z thomas 15:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Category:Folk dance by country

Hi. I opened Category:Folk dance by country to discussion, and I did not make any change thereat. Your contributions to the discussion would be most welcome. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 13:31, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

File:How home is refuge how strong is border how legal is justice how liberal is freedom how many is germany how brave is fear how climate is change how is longing how native is nation how human is right answer is question present is wall 01.jpg

Hi, do you really mean to promote "wikimedia.commons.org" instead of "commons.wikimedia.org" in the "Copyright holder" field of the metadata of your uploads like File:How home is refuge how strong is border how legal is justice how liberal is freedom how many is germany how brave is fear how climate is change how is longing how native is nation how human is right answer is question present is wall 01.jpg? See also COM:USER#Regarding licenses.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 13:55, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

irks. That is an error. I will fix it with the next uploads (but will not create extra uploads only for this correction). --C.Suthorn (talk) 14:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Dateibeschreibung als Template

Ich habe gesehen, dass du die Dateibeschreibung für einige Fotos in ein Template gepackt hast. Ich halte das für eine ziemlich blöde Idee, da es dadurch nicht mehr möglich ist die Beschreibung für einzelne Dateien anzupassen und es außerdem deutlich umständlicher ist die Beschreibung überhaupt zu ändern. Der Vorteil Fehler in der ursprünglichen Beschreibung einfach zentral zu korrigieren überwiegt wohl eher nicht. --GPSLeo (talk) 19:12, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Tatsächlich habe ich es bislang nur erlebt, dass bei Medien, die auf die Hauptseite kamen, dritte eine Dateibeschreibung dann auch nicht geändert, sondern weitere sprachen ergänzt haben (was durch das template nicht verhindert wird). Die Dateien haben auch keine individuellen Beschreibungen und werden auch durch dritte keine bekommen (im grunde arbeiten nur bots an fremden uploads). Für kategorien mit unterkategorien plane ich das template zu parametrisieren, das wird aber noch dauern. Mir ermöglichen die templates aber bei meinen eigenen Uploads bessere Informationen zu den Dateien zu geben. Sollte allerdings die Zahl der Mitarbeitenden an Commons demnächst unerwartet in die Höhe schiessen, würde das die Situation vielleicht ändern :-) Bis dahin sind die ausführlicheren Dateibeschreibungen vielleicht eine Möglichkeit, dass weniger ungeeignete captions und depicts von gelegenheits-bearbeitern erstellt werden. (und das wort mit b gehört nicht zu meinem aktiven wortschatz, egal wem gegenüber) --C.Suthorn (talk) 20:54, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

---

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:C.Suthorn. Use of the the COM:CAPTIONS of every uploaded file for personal declaration of the own opinion on this software feature.. Thank you.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by GPSLeo (talk • contribs) 08:11, 24 October 2020‎ (UTC)

Bilder auf Wikimedia Commons

Hallo! Du hast auf meiner Seite eine Nachricht hinterlassen. Zu dem Logo auf der Seite X ( Manga) gebe ich dir Recht es stammt von dem Diskussionsforum. Falls es sich hier um eine Urheberrechtverletzung handelt könnt ihr das Logo meinetwegen löschen. Das Bild von den 2 kurdischen Frauen ( Yelda Ebasî ) stammt 100 % von mir . Ich habe es auf dem Festival mit meinem Handy geschossen. Das Alita Bild stammt von Wikimedia Commons und wurde von mir bearbeitet. Zu Tanja Bruske habe ich per Facebook Kontakt und sie hat für das Bild eine lizenzfreie Genehmigung erteilt. Leider bin ich kein Commons Experte und es wäre toll wenn jemand mich unterstützen würde. https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Forum?markasread=28975007&markasreadwiki=commonswiki#Bild_von_Tanja_Bruske Avestaboy (talk) 22:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Stereoscopic images

Thank you again for your help at the Village Pump. I was just admiring your stereoscopic (3D) images and noticed that some of them aren't actually stereoscopic: File:Sundial at Marktkirche in Hannover in 3D 1.jpg, File:Eiserner Steg in 3D 2.jpg and File:Sculptures at Historisches Museum in Frankfurt am Main in 3D 1.jpg each feature 2 identical copies of a single image rather than 2 distinct (left/right) images. Perhaps there was an error during processing that escaped your attention? An easy mistake to make, I'm sure. Anyway, I thought it worth mentioning. Hopefully you still have the original files so you can re-upload them correctly. All the best, nagualdesign 07:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. Of course I have the original files (and also a database detailing where I stored which file) so I will look on that and correct mistakes. But not at once, I am busy with more urgent projocts at the moment. (an additional note: I have recently started to use "StereoPhotoMaker" (a japanese software) that is specialized in processing Stereo images and siginificantlty reduces the chance of processing errors) --C.Suthorn (talk) 08:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

There's no rush, of course. Fun fact: I have a similar photographic hobby but kind of the opposite in a way. I take photographs using a panoramic tripod head, which ensures that there's zero parallax when panning and tilting so that the photographs can be seamlessly stitched into a panorama, whereas you make sure that there's always a certain amount of parallax. nagualdesign 01:45, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:International Women's Day in 2021 in Asia

Category:International Women's Day in 2021 in Asia is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

 

In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. When you want to delete a file by manually using the {{Delete}} template, please remember to follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion, otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 06:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

I clearly did not request a speedy deletion -quite contrarly. --C.Suthorn (talk) 07:56, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:Dyke_March_(Americas)

Category:Dyke_March_(Americas) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 11:48, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

'Quad' stereographic photography

Hello! I hope you're well. I thought that this might interest you: Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science#'Quad' stereographic photography, and wasn't sure if my botched attempt to ping you would work. All the best, nagualdesign 04:51, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

ping did not work. Answered there. --C.Suthorn (talk) 06:47, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

externe Nutzung

Hi, hier eine externe Nutzung[1] eines Fotos von dir; leider nicht genau angegeben welches. --Túrelio (talk) 08:13, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

@Túrelio: Äh, doch. Das Bild ist zwar beschnitten und nach webp umgewandelt, aber der Dateiname wurde behalten (und um Ziffern erweitert). War also leicht zu finden :-) Nur, dass Heise dieses pur verwendet und ich die Seite nur in einem privaten Fenster öffnen konnte. --C.Suthorn (talk) 08:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Bowling Green, Greenwich Village (27238996058).jpg

Sorry about that, I misread who made the change. I've gone ahead and moved the file. Elli (talk) 22:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Südkreuz

Hallo, danke für die Südkreuz-Bilder! Ich verwende [2] (mit Attribution, natürlich!) in einem Vortrag über Probleme bei KI und Gesichtserkennung. --WiseWoman (talk) 15:52, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

@WiseWoman:  :-) Wird es den Vortrag auch online geben? Oder als Skript oder in einem Reader? --C.Suthorn (talk) 15:56, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Queerdenken711 und 80 weitere angemeldete Demos in Berlin 2020-08-01 6 part 9 of 2.webm

Copyright status: File:Queerdenken711 und 80 weitere angemeldete Demos in Berlin 2020-08-01 6 part 9 of 2.webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Queerdenken711 und 80 weitere angemeldete Demos in Berlin 2020-08-01 6 part 9 of 2.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Unterkategorie Reichstag

Hallo C. Suthorn, ich habe gesehen, dass Sie meine Änderung wieder rückgängig gemacht haben in Bezug auf die Category:Reichstag (building), weshalb ich jetzt hier mal die Klärung suche. Die Kategorisierung macht doch nur dann Sinn, wenn sie die Bilderflut einzelner Themen oder Objekte eingrenzt bzw. strukturiert. Die Tatsache, dass man bei einer Veranstaltung u.a. auch ein Gebäude im Hintergrund sieht - hier z.B. der Reichstag rechtfertigt doch nicht gleich eine "eigene" Unterkategorie - noch dazu sieht man auf den meisten Bildern das Gebäude überhaupt nicht. In Ihrem Fall... so spannend und interessant auch der abgebildete Sachverhalt sein mag, ist es lediglich eine Veranstaltung vor dem Reichstag - und hierfür gibt es eine eigene Kategorie: Events at the Reichstag und die Categorie Die Partei bzw. Sonneborn. Andernfalls würde man ja sonst bei jeder Veranstaltung eine eigene Unterkategorie anlegen können - was wiederum zur Folge hätte, dass die Category Reichstag völlig überfrachtet wird, da täglich mehrere Veranstaltungen vor dem Reichstag stattfinden. Von daher halte ich meine anfängliche Argumentation aufrecht und behaupte, dass die Kategorie hier nicht zielführend ist.--Kasa Fue (talk) 14:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

@Kasa Fue: Eine Umkategorisierung von "Reichstag (building)" zu "Events at Reichstag" hätte ich mit Sicherheit nicht rückgängig gemacht, genausowenig wie ich die Umkategorisierung von "Reichstag" zu "Reichstag (building)" zuvor durch einen anderen User zurückgängig gemacht habe. Die Medien auf Commons sind zur Nutzung auf WM und überall sonst im Web, in gedruckten Werken oder auch zum privat an die Wand hängen gedacht. Dazu müssen sie aber auch gefunden werden. Das ersatzlose Entfernen von Informationen trägt nicht dazu bei. Das Ergänzen und Verfeinern von Informationen begrüße ich ausdrücklich. Nachsatz: Neue Themen auf Disks bitte immer unten anfügen, ich habe diesen Abschnitt erst garnicht gefunden, dann nur über die History. --C.Suthorn (talk) 17:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Bot

Please modify your bot so that it does not modify more than 100 files from the same category in a single bot run. As it is you flooded my watchlist with more than 1000 edits over the night. Schlurcherbot and Botmultichill were obviously modified to do this some month ago. --C.Suthorn (talk) 07:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello I understand, Gzen92Bot has the bot flag normally. I used my bot not to do it by hand which would have been "worse". sorry again. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 08:22, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Eurosolar-Preis 2021 004.jpg

Copyright status: File:Eurosolar-Preis 2021 004.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Eurosolar-Preis 2021 004.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Eurosolar-Preis 2021 005.jpg
• File:Eurosolar-Preis 2021 006.jpg
• File:Eurosolar-Preis 2021 001.jpg
• File:Eurosolar-Preis 2021 002.jpg
• File:Eurosolar-Preis 2021 003.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:12, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:150 Jahre Paragraph 218 Protest in Frankfurt Übermalung einer Wand mit der Zahl 218.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Queerdenken711 und 80 weitere angemeldete Demos in Berlin 2020-08-01 6 part 1 of 9.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Black Lives Matter Berlin 6.6.2020 Schweigedemo video.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Aktionstag zum 219a.webm

Copyright status: File:Aktionstag zum 219a.webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Aktionstag zum 219a.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:05, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Madeleina Kay as EUsupergirl in Dsseldorf 2.webm

Copyright status: File:Madeleina Kay as EUsupergirl in Dsseldorf 2.webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Madeleina Kay as EUsupergirl in Dsseldorf 2.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Demo in Berlin zum Referendum ber die Verstaatlichung groer Wohnungsunternehmen.webm
• File:Madeleina Kay as EUsupergirl in Dsseldorf.webm

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:07, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Lost.webm

Copyright status: File:Lost.webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lost.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Venus berlin 2019 135.webm

Copyright status: File:Venus berlin 2019 135.webm

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Venus berlin 2019 135.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Piss-In, Pee for Free 2022 Berlin 07.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Autokorso in Hannover 2022-04-10 11.webm

File:Autokorso in Hannover 2022-04-10 11.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Allo002 (talk) 15:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Pride Parade Brussels 2022 02 part 1 of 3.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Resource usage

OK, I just happened to spot this one on the Commons Main page.. While I appreciate the effort, I do wonder if we should be spending 4 GB (or rather in this case actually 18,5 GB, because of multiple upload revisions) for 5 minutes of video at a resolution that is... cinema worthy.. It seems rather excessive to me. Could this video not have been optimized before upload ? —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Ich biete zwar an Videocaptures von den MP4-Originalen meiner Videos zu machen. Tatsächlich ist es aber wahrscheinlicher, dass eine Weiterverwendung in Form eines Videocaptures vom hochgeladenen WEBM-File und ohne mich vorher zu fragen gemacht wird. Das ist ein Grund, warum ich die bestmögliche Qualität hochlade. Wer sich ein Video von Commons ansieht, wird fast nie das hochgeladene Original herunterladen, sondern fast immer einen der Transcodes, die von der MediaWiki-Software nur einmal nach dem Upload generiert werden und die sowohl eine niederige Auflösung als auch eine niedrigere Bandbreite haben. Gwöhnlich zwischen wenigen MB und 200 MB. Das wäre nicht anders , wenn ich die Videos in niedriger Qualität hochlade. Leider kann die MW-Software nur mit Dateien von maximal 4GiB umgehen. Das liegt daran, dass in drei Datenbanktabellen der MW-Software die Dateigrößem als unsigened 32bit Integer gespeichert wird. In der Vergangenheit gabe es eine Javascript-Lösung (mit eigenem Namensraum) die Videos abspielen konnte, die aus mehreren Einzeldateien bestehen. Es wäre scön, wenn das zurückkäme. Ohnehin ist es fast unmöglich Dateien von mehr als 3,5GB hochzuladen. Bis 50 MB gibt es derzeit praktisch keine Probleme, bis 500 MB nur selten, bis 1,2GB geht es häufig, dannach wird es schwierig. Allein deshalb ist es besser nur eine Version in maximaler Qualität hochzuladen. Was da ist, ist da. --C.Suthorn (talk) 16:14, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Oh and by the way: It would be nice to upload MP4 and MW-software transcodes to AV1. --C.Suthorn (talk) 16:15, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Verleihung des Max-Beckmann-Preises an Valie Export in der Paulskirche in Frankfurt am Main am 18. Juni 2022 mit Ina Hartwig, Sylvie Fleury und Julie Kuhl und Begleitung 001.jpg

Copyright status: File:Verleihung des Max-Beckmann-Preises an Valie Export in der Paulskirche in Frankfurt am Main am 18. Juni 2022 mit Ina Hartwig, Sylvie Fleury und Julie Kuhl und Begleitung 001.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Verleihung des Max-Beckmann-Preises an Valie Export in der Paulskirche in Frankfurt am Main am 18. Juni 2022 mit Ina Hartwig, Sylvie Fleury und Julie Kuhl und Begleitung 001.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Verleihung des Max-Beckmann-Preises an Valie Export in der Paulskirche in Frankfurt am Main am 18. Juni 2022 mit Ina Hartwig, Sylvie Fleury und Julie Kuhl und Begleitung 002.jpg
• File:Verleihung des Max-Beckmann-Preises an Valie Export in der Paulskirche in Frankfurt am Main am 18. Juni 2022 mit Ina Hartwig, Sylvie Fleury und Julie Kuhl und Begleitung 003.jpg
• File:Verleihung des Max-Beckmann-Preises an Valie Export in der Paulskirche in Frankfurt am Main am 18. Juni 2022 mit Ina Hartwig, Sylvie Fleury und Julie Kuhl und Begleitung 004.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:08, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Sign Language Videos

Follow up of Commons:Village pump/Archive/2022/07#New Sign language videos not displayed properly.

Hello C., thank for your input. Generally speaking, :file and :media files are (should be) the same file from what was uploaded, unless Commons does some minor media processing on those. File:LL-Q33302_(fsl)-Antoine_l._(0x010C)-livre.webm (then click to download full version), media:LL-Q33302_(fsl)-Antoine_l._(0x010C)-livre.webm and https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bc/LL-Q33302_%28fsl%29-Antoine_l._%280x010C%29-livre.webm should be the same file.

For a lead on that bug, I think Lingualibre is messing up some encoding or metadata when sending the file to commons. But since there isn't an easy answer, I opened a ticket on Wikimedia Phabricator, and it will need to wait a for a web (?) dev to dig into that. Nothing more we contributors can do. Yug (talk) 12:45, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

@Yug: Does Lingua Libre use an own Upload tool? If so, this tool could check if file length and message digest are identical between uploaded and local file (the server provides this data after the assembly stage, before the upload tool request publishing.) C.Suthorn (talk) 14:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes, it use Upload2Commons, a custom MediaWiki extension. The weird thing is, this code did not change in past 3 years. But all videos media uploads are now read by Commons as audios. Given no one on Commons seems to know about this issue, I think it's more to do with our recording MediaWiki extension, which changed a bit a year ago. Yug (talk) 17:13, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Omg, I suddenly understood what you said the first day.

I don't have that file anymore, it's a temporary video file in the web browser's which is then sent to Commons, the temporary file in the browser is not kept. But It is displayed, so we have an avenue to download it and compare those two origine file vs file on Commons. Thanks for the hint. Yug (talk) 13:35, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

• 2019 sign language video files uploaded by LinguaLibre

• 2022 sign language video files uploaded by LinguaLibre

Hello C.Suthorn, the discussion has suddenly deepen phab:T312554 Yug (talk) 20:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Verleihung des Max-Beckmann-Preises an Valie Export in der Paulskirche in Frankfurt am Main am 18. Juni 2022 mit Ina Hartwig, Sylvie Fleury und Julie Kuhl und Begleitung 233.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Weltweit einziges 11-Sterne Hotel Burj Al Arab mit detailgetreuem Nachbau des Schiefen Turm von Pisa als grosser Attraktion fuer die Gaeste 01.jpg

File:Weltweit einziges 11-Sterne Hotel Burj Al Arab mit detailgetreuem Nachbau des Schiefen Turm von Pisa als grosser Attraktion fuer die Gaeste 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

77.8.51.17 16:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

Duplicates

Hi C.Suthorn, Just wondering could I ask where do you find the list that gives duplicate numbers to that user ?, I'm just curious as to how I've managed to upload 244 duplicates here, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 16:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

File:St Ulbricht - Kreuz.jpg

File:St Ulbricht - Kreuz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lukas Beck (talk) 14:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Last night in Sweden.jpg

File:Last night in Sweden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lukas Beck (talk) 05:27, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

File:2019 CSD Kölm 155.jpg

File:2019 CSD Kölm 155.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

File:2019 CSD Köln 155 (cropped) Elect a Clown, Expect a Circus.jpg

File:2019 CSD Köln 155 (cropped) Elect a Clown, Expect a Circus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

File:2019 CSD Kölm 154.jpg

File:2019 CSD Kölm 154.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

File:2019 CSD Köln 154 (cropped) Love trumps hate, Make America gay again.jpg

File:2019 CSD Köln 154 (cropped) Love trumps hate, Make America gay again.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:37, 10 December 2022 (UTC)