User talk:Pruneau

Archives 2008 2009 2010

Exact duplicate

Hi. Regarding your closure note, #3 of {{Duplicate}} says exact duplicate - otherwise use COM:DR. Wknight94 ^talk 13:14, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Lise de La Salle.jpg

File:Lise de La Salle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

File:ManonAzem.JPG et File:PatrickMesse.jpg

Bonjour, Je ne comprends pas très bien pourquoi ces deux fichiers ont été taggés avec {{Npd}}. Je n'ai rien contre envoyer un courriel à OTRS si tu penses que c'est vraiment nécessaire, mais généralement, quand un fichier est marqué comme "travail personnel" par un utilisateur régulier de Commons, c'est considéré comme suffisant. Pruneau^talk 11:26, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Si ces images ont été publiées auparavant sur le site La Gazette du Sorcier, comme le laisse penser le crédit, il est indispensable de prouver en envoyant une autorisation via OTRS que vous êtes bien le propriétaire de ce site.

Sinon, n'importe qui pourrait importer les images de ce site en disant qu'il s'agit de son travail personnel.--Bapti ✉ 12:37, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour, Ces images n'avaient pas été publiées ailleurs auparavant (elles ont été prises lors d'un événement auquel j'ai assisté grâce à la Gazette du Sorcier, d'où la licence). J'ai envoyé une autorisation à OTRS, mais je continue à penser que c'était superflu. Pruneau^talk 11:13, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Si la photo ne vient pas du site La Gazette du Sorcier, le crédit est un petit peu abusif. Le soucis est qu'il laisse penser que l'image provient de ce site, ce qui nécessite une autorisation. En tout cas, le soucis est réglé puis l'autorisation a été validée.--Bapti ✉ 16:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Tristane Banon

Bonjour. Je ne comprends pas pourquoi vous avez supprimer la photo. Sur picasa, il est bien indiqué ici que la photo est sous Creative Commons, (on le voit en cliquant sur Certains droits réservés). Alors là j'ai pas compris ! Cdlt, Cl;nintendods (talk) 14:58, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour. La personne qui a mis la photo sur Picasa n'est pas l'auteur de la photo. Cette personne n'avait donc pas le droit de décider sous quelle licence la photo se trouve. Cette décision ne peut être prise que par le photographe, Daniel Janin, et son employeur l'AFP. Malgré ce qui est marqué sur Picasa, cette photo est bel et bien encore sous copyright. Cordialement, Pruneau^talk 15:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

De-adminship warning

Dear Pruneau. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Trijnstel_talk 23:31, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:ManonAzem.JPG

Hello, recently I found your deletion request of a portrait image of a notable person, but I feared the deletion may be a potencially serious problem because if the subject from a country that has restrictive consent requirements never permits taking a freely-licensed photos of him/her, that means we have no chance to get and use free images of the subject. However, the licensing resolution of WMF says, "An EDP may not allow material where we can reasonably expect someone to upload a freely licensed file for the same purpose, such as is the case for almost all portraits of living notable individuals." Do we have a good solution of this issue? two month ago, a Commons administrator answered me a similar question about this issue at village pump,

Commons:Photographs of identifiable people aims to respect local laws. Most laws where consent is sometimes required for photographs taken in public make exceptions for public figures. Those exceptions may not be total (ie still some respect for public figures' private lives), but they're generally enough to allow ordinary photographs needed for illustrating Wikipedia articles. Rd232 (talk) 12:17, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

--Puramyun31 (talk) 10:46, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I don't really have an answer to your question. I guess that when a public figure appears at a public event, they cannot reasonably systematically refuse that photos be taken. The case of Manon Azem is more borderline, since she is not a well-known person, the image is bad quality and she was a minor when the image was taken: I think it is reasonable that she request deletion. If we delete this image of her, I think there is a fair chance I could get a good replacement image from her (so everybody wins). Pruneau^talk 11:40, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

De-adminship notice

Hello. Because you failed to made 5 log actions since the start of the last inactivity review, your admin flag will be removed. Best regards. – Kwj2772 (msg) 10:28, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Pruneau⧽: العربية, български, Deutsch, English, ‎français, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎മലയാളം, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska, اردو, 中文

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 7 February 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Pruneau⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Pruneau,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Jean-Paul Faugère.jpg

File:Jean-Paul Faugère.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 18:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Pruneau,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Thierry de Montbrial.jpg

File:Thierry de Montbrial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 17:59, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Grafik aktualisieren?

Hallo Pruneau,
im Artikel "de:Polygamie" wird deine Grafik benutzt, aber dazu gibt es 2 kritische Anmerkungen auf der Diskussionsseite:

• Oman:
  Stimmt es, das es im Oman keine anerkannte Polygamie gibt? auf der Website der Auslandsvertretung des Oman habe ich gegenteiliges gelesen. die Staaten der arabischen Halbinsel haben kein eigenständiges Gesetzbuch wie wir im "civil law" die Staaten setzen die sharia unmittelbar um, nach welcher Männer bis zu vier Frauen heiraten dürfen (legal und anerkannt), dieser beitrag bezieht sich auf die karte, in welcher die Staaten mit legaler und anerkannter Polygamie grün markiert sind, alle Staaten der Halbinsel mit außnahme des Oman. Ist das so beabsichtigt oder ein fehler in der grafik? --(nicht signierter Beitrag von 80.122.117.74, 19:54, 20. Jul. 2017‎)
• Afrika:
  Im Abschnitt zu Afrika steht, dass Kenia die Polygamie legalisiert hat, Kenia ist in der Grafik aber nicht grün markiert als Land mit legaler Vielehe. Auch Swasiland und Südafrika sind in der Grafik nicht grün markiert, im Abschnitt zu Afrika steht aber, dass Jacob Zuma und der König von Swasiland mehrere Ehefrauen haben. Das wäre nur miteinander vereinbar, wenn Jacob Zuma und der König von Swasiland mit ihren Vielehen öffentlich bekannt gegen die eigenen Gesetze verstoßen. --94.220.164.105 23:52, 30. Mai 2018 (CEST)

Wäre es dir möglich, das Bild entsprechend anzupassen? Bitte bitte... :) Grüße --Chiananda (talk) 19:00, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Hallo, ich glaube dass die Grafik File:Legality of polygamy.svg besser ist. Passt sie? Pruneau^talk 14:52, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Mikhail Pletnev.jpg

File:Mikhail Pletnev.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

....HMS (talk) 10:13, 11 October 2018 (UTC)