User talk:Tgr

I rarely read this page, please contact me on the Hungarian Wikipedia (hu:User vita:Tgr) if it's important.

Re: Upload form

Hi Tgr. Finally I had a look at your catinsert tool. It's pretty nifty, but not as useful as it might be on Commons I think, because browsing from the top of the tree to the bottom is actually quite painful. The concept is good though :)

Re: the interface is fine, what I meant is it would be nice to see a second description box in my language of choice open by default even if I set the interface to english (programmers tend to do that because localisations usually suck; MediaWiki's is pretty good, but old reflexes die hard :-) - Do you mean a generic second box, or you really want some way to specify a second language to appear? Because there's no way we could guess that, is there?

cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 11:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Indeed catinsert is pretty cool... a pity it's tied to the edit bar (I, for one, have it disabled...). But with some work the actual category display and selection functionality could probably be separated from the insert-into-some-textfield functionality and be turned into a re-usable stand-alone Javascript, and then we could think about how to integrate it into HotCat (where it could start the tree display at the category matching the user's input?). There are situations where a tree view-and-select functionality may be more appropriate than HotCat's autosuggestions. If we could somehow provide both interfaces in an unobtrusive way that'd be great. Lupo 14:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

deprecated function in your monobook.js

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hungary budapest districts.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 48bcbc71a97939730e474918956c9688

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! --Tgr (talk) 16:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

köszönöm. (andi.jpg)

A kép Andi régi weboldalához készült. Nem tudom biztosan, de azt hiszem az úrnak több másik képe is felkerült arra a weboldal verzióra. A gond az, hogy wincseszterhalál miatt elveszett az eredeti kép amit a fényképezőgépem csinált, és csak jpg maradt fenn. Szóval nem tudom bizonyítani. Ja és igen. Nem profi fotós vagyok, csak ismerem, és szeretem Andit. Hagyjuk. Amit utoljára felajánlottam, (kértem) hogy egy újabb képem feltettem a http://dombi.borda.ca/andi/wikipedia/ tárhelyre. Van ilyen fórum is, (borda.ca) de tárhelynek is használhatom. És ide feltettem az eredeti .nef képet is ami a nikon fényképezőgépem formátuma. Ebben kértem segítséget, hogy feltehetem e, és milyen licenszel? Vagy ha nem nagy kérés, (ugye szabadon szerkeszthető?) megköszönném ha feltöltené (valaki). Előre is köszönöm a segítségedet. dombi1976

Pont és kurziválás

Szia, Tgr, csak szólok, hogy ne tegyél pontot a képaláírások végére, mert megyek utánad törölni őket } A képaláírások címszerűek, nincs pont a végükön. Ugyanez a kurziválásnál, amikor egy dög tudományos nevét kurziválod, tedd léci a zárójelekkel együtt. Tudom, hogy ezek piszlicsáré dolgok, de mégis. Köszi. Pasztilla (talk) 19:24, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Úgy érted, hogy a tengeri csiga után zárójelben a faj tudományos neve van? De igen, azt hiszem, igazad van, megyek javítani. (Én meg a féléketírtottam, mert az is rendszertani kategória, csöbörből vödörbe.) Pasztilla (talk) 21:14, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Közvetlenül belenyúlkáltam a képaláírásba pontügyben. Ebben az esetben nem ördöngösség mondatot faragni az eredetiben kettébontott szövegből. Egyébként a könyvszerkesztési kiskáté és általános gyakorlat szerint amennyiben többmondatos egy képaláírás, természetesen pontokkal határoljuk el a mondatokat, csak az utolsó mondat végére nem kerül írásjel. Én eztet már szerkesztőkoromban is utáltam, és a kétmondatos képaláírásokat inkább tipográfiailag tagoltam el, amire itt is lehetőségünk van, bár kevésbé szép eredménnyel, mondjuk:

A Brahmaputra felső folyása Tibetben
A háttérben egy jeti körvonalai láthatóak

Pasztilla (talk) 14:34, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Köszi, majd ügyelek rá ezentúl. Kijavítom azokban, ahun eddig dógosztam. --Teemeah (talk) 12:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Fake flag

Kérlek ne terjeszd az újra és újra felbukkanó hamis magyar zászlót. 1957-1989 között sem volt címer a magyar zászlón, az általda feltöltött címeres verziót soha sehol nem használták hivatalosan, illetve emlékeim és tudásom szerint nemhivatalosan sem.

--84.3.57.128 04:37, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Toolbaricon italic D.png

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:36, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

File:FlagRev dropdown bug.png

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:55, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

"File:Coa Algeria Country History (1962-1971).svg"

I'm sorry, but it's kind of a stupid name (which is not just my opinion, but also Fry 1989's), and User:Madboy74 has been conspicuously completely unable to provide any meaningful cogent relevant rationale as to why the image should have that name (though he has been fairly quick to sling random meaningless personal insults, and he felt free to resort to semi-underhanded maneuvers to get the name changed even though he was well aware that there were objections). It certainly does not follow any common naming convention for national emblems or coats of arms on Wikimedia Commons, and has a number of undesirable idiosyncratic peculiarities which User:Madboy74 has been unable to explain. AnonMoos (talk) 11:11, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

If the new name is so great, then why can't User:Madboy74 give the slightest meaningful explanation for its alleged greatness, and why does he have to resort to semi-underhanded maneuvers to get his way? AnonMoos (talk) 15:12, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

"optimizing it is simply not worth the time lost and feelings hurt" -- possibly, but the way in which User:Madboy74 went to great lengths and resorted to petty semi-underhanded maneuvers to get a better name replaced with a worse name (when he was very well aware that there were objections) did not do anything to inspire great confidence or promote good-will -- and the fact that he seems to have a large vocabulary of English-language puerile insults and childish tauntings at his command means that he can't retreat behind a "NO SPEAKA DA INGLEEZ" defense. User:Madboy74 has largely created the current situation by his previous poor behavior. AnonMoos (talk) 04:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Peterborough-i_sziklafigua.jpg

Szia Tgr! Azon a vitalapon mondod, hogy nevezzük át a képet. Igaz, hogy kifelejtettem a r betűt, de nem tudom átnevezni. És mégegyszer nem akarom feltölteni, úgyis már baj van vele. Esetleg meg tudod csinálni te? Üdv. DenesFeri (talk) 09:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

OK, akkor ezentúl beteszem a sablont. Kösz. DenesFeri (talk) 07:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bazilika (615. számú műemlék) 2.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bazilika (615. számú műemlék) 2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Bazilika (615. számú műemlék) 2.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 15:11, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bencés főapátsági templom (4640. számú műemlék) 21.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bencés főapátsági templom (4640. számú műemlék) 21.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 15:12, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Tgr, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:13, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bazilika (615. számú műemlék) 12.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bazilika (615. számú műemlék) 12.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Lymantria (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Additional: The image is licensed cc-by-nd at source. Lymantria (talk) 07:55, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

 Done. You can check it on the source page. Samat (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 06:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

 Done Samat (talk) 13:36, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Xav. Szt. Ferenc kápolna (6041. számú műemlék) 64.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Xav. Szt. Ferenc kápolna (6041. számú műemlék) 64.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 18:55, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

 Done Samat (talk) 10:49, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Bots/Requests/IndareviewR

Hi Tgr, it would be kind if you could comment there and answer the question about your bot's internals. Thank you. BTW: The images your bot uploaded are really nice and useful. -- RE rillke questions? 20:53, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Szélmalom (3534. számú műemlék) 6.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Szélmalom (3534. számú műemlék) 6.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

MGA73 (talk) 11:50, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

The image is also on http://www.panoramio.com/photo/26140806 in larger version. I do not understand the language. Perhaps you can tell if it is the same person who has both accounts? --MGA73 (talk) 12:35, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Probably the same person (the userpage at indafoto links to the panoramio user page, and the indafoto user name is the English translation of his first name). Will ask why he changed the licensing. --Tgr (talk) 13:11, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Solved. Samat (talk) 18:42, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vár (6470. számú műemlék) 4.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vár (6470. számú műemlék) 4.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

also

• File:Vázsonykő várromja (10085. számú műemlék) 10.jpg
• File:Székesegyház (10682. számú műemlék) 7.jpg
• File:Püspöki jószágigazgatóság (10635. számú műemlék).jpg
• File:Tüztorony (10689. számú műemlék) 8.jpg
• File:Lánchíd (17. számú műemlék) 16.jpg

-- RE rillke questions? 20:02, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Solved, except File:Lánchíd (17. számú műemlék) 16.jpg Samat (talk) 18:44, 4 December 2011 (UTC).

File:Lánchíd (17. számú műemlék) 16.jpg -- "cancelled" free licence :( Samat (talk) 09:04, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Vízház (13326. számú műemlék) 91.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vízház (13326. számú műemlék) 91.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Vízház (13326. számú műemlék) 91.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 19:27, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

• File:Rk. Csatatéri fogadalmi emléktemplom (1538. számú műemlék).jpg
• File:R. k. (Szent Rókus) templom (11171. számú műemlék) 7.jpg
• File:Hatszintes malomház és magtár, ún. Kovács-malom (2414. számú műemlék).jpg
• File:Festetics-kastély (10876. számú műemlék) 4.jpg

-- RE rillke questions? 20:02, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Problems detected by IndareviewR

No source (This may be also due to invalid HTML on a page):

• File:Zsinagóga (17737. számú műemlék) 54.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Zsinagóga (17737. számú műemlék) 53.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Zsidó hitközségi kultúrház (18600. számú műemlék) 55.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- permission OK: reviewed + permission sent to OTRS Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Vízház (13326. számú műemlék) 91.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- delete per uploader's request (not a monument) Samat (talk) 09:20, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Vármegyei Kaszinó (Tudomány és Technika háza) (6044. számú műemlék) 66.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Vasbeton víztorony (12534. számú műemlék) 65.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- permission OK, sent to OTRS Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Templomrom (9848. számú műemlék) 9.jpg (indafoto, by rezirezi) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Szabadság híd (410. számú műemlék) 3.jpg (indafoto, by hunszabi) -- "cancelled" free licence :( Samat (talk) 09:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Szabadság híd (410. számú műemlék) 2.jpg (indafoto, by hunszabi) -- "cancelled" free licence :( Samat (talk) 09:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Rk. Csatatéri fogadalmi emléktemplom (1538. számú műemlék).jpg (indafoto, by C.Mike) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 21:18, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Református parókia (18596. számú műemlék) 51.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:R. k. templom (Vártemplom; Magyarok Nagyasszonya) (6055. számú műemlék) 63.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Obermayer–Hubay-féle bérház (Varga Katalin Gimnázium) (6051. számú műemlék) 59.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- permission OK, sent to OTRS Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Nep. Szt. János-szobor (6054. számú műemlék) 62.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Nemzeti Szálloda (6053. számú műemlék) 86.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Millenniumi emlékmű (1228. számú műemlék) 2.jpg (indafoto, by hunszabi) -- "cancelled" free licence :( Samat (talk) 09:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Megyeháza (6046. számú műemlék) 75.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Magyar Király Szálloda (Damjanich János Múzeum) (6045. számú műemlék) 60.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Lánchíd (17. számú műemlék) 16.jpg (indafoto, by hunszabi) -- "cancelled" free licence :( Samat (talk) 09:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Lánchíd (17. számú műemlék) 14.jpg (indafoto, by hunszabi) -- "cancelled" free licence :( Samat (talk) 09:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Indóház (13325. számú műemlék) 90.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Hatszintes malomház és magtár, ún. Kovács-malom (2414. számú műemlék).jpg (indafoto, by upsalatty)
• File:Gör. kat. kápolna (Sarlós Boldogasszony-kápolna) (6049. számú műemlék) 77.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Gör. kat. kápolna (Sarlós Boldogasszony-kápolna) (6049. számú műemlék) 70.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Főgimnázium (Verseghy Ferenc Gimnázium) (6061. számú műemlék) 92.jpg (indafoto, by rudolfoto) -- source OK, reviewed Samat (talk) 09:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
• File:Festetics-kastély (10876. számú műemlék) 4.jpg (indafoto, by adam0326) -- OK: reuploaded at original source Samat (talk) 21:17, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

-- RE rillke questions? 11:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Lánchíd (17. számú műemlék) 14.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lánchíd (17. számú műemlék) 14.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Lánchíd (17. számú műemlék) 14.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 18:23, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

"Cancelled" free licence :( -- Samat (talk) 09:18, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Szabadság híd (410. számú műemlék) 3.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Szabadság híd (410. számú műemlék) 3.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Szabadság híd (410. számú műemlék) 3.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Lymantria (talk) 18:25, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

"Cancelled" free licence :( -- Samat (talk) 09:18, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Millenniumi emlékmű (1228. számú műemlék) 2.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Millenniumi emlékmű (1228. számú műemlék) 2.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Millenniumi emlékmű (1228. számú műemlék) 2.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Leoboudv (talk) 07:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

"Cancelled" free licence :( -- Samat (talk) 09:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Millenniumi emlékmű (1228. számú műemlék) 4.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Millenniumi emlékmű (1228. számú műemlék) 4.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Millenniumi emlékmű (1228. számú műemlék) 4.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Leoboudv (talk) 07:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

"Cancelled" free licence :( -- Samat (talk) 09:22, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Szabadság híd (410. számú műemlék) 2.jpg

File:Szabadság híd (410. számú műemlék) 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--Leoboudv (talk) 07:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

"Cancelled" free licence :( -- Samat (talk) 09:23, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Hungarian stamps

Hi, is this text about Hungarian stamps being PD correct? --Eleassar ^(t/p) 07:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me! I tried to clarify my opinion on the talk page. Don't expect a definitive answer from me, though. --Tgr (talk) 10:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 11:14, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Insignia Hungary Political Party KDNP.svg

Helló!

Mi a gond a képpel, hogy törlésre jelölted?

Üdv: Madboy74 (talk) 08:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

@Madboy74: : ahogy a törlési jelölés indoklásában is írtam, a {{PD-textlogo}} azokra a képekre alkalmazható, amiknek nincs egyéni-eredeti jellegük, a KDNP logó szerintem ránézésre sem ilyen. --Tgr (talk) 17:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Nem vagyok mágusa a jogi dolgoknak, de át lehetne-e írni valahogy, hogy minden kitételnek megfeleljen? Madboy74 (talk) 19:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Mármint hogy mit lehetne átírni? --Tgr (talk) 04:38, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

A jogosultságokat, milyen lehetőségekkel lehet felhasználni, stb. Mint említettem, nem tudok és nem is szeretek ilyennel foglalkozni. Inkább rajzolok. Bár a jelek szerint ilyeneket már nem. Maradok a címereknél. Madboy74 (talk) 14:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

@Madboy74: : Nem lehet felhasználni; ha lehetne, nem jelöltem volna törlésre. A tulajdonostól (párt) lehet rá engedélyt kérnil de még úgy is csak a magyar Wikipédiára tölthető fel (ha csak nem hajlandók Creative Commons licenc alá tenni a logót, amin meglepődnék). --Tgr (talk) 06:08, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Megértettem. Akkor jöjjön, aminek jönnie kell :) Madboy74 (talk) 08:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:1956 memorial BUTE 2.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:1956 memorial BUTE 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1956 memorial BUTE 2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Steinsplitter (talk) 09:18, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:1956 memorial BUTE.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:1956 memorial BUTE.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1956 memorial BUTE.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Steinsplitter (talk) 09:18, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!

TT65594 - Tgr claimed this task. Thanks :-) Steinsplitter (talk) 11:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

File:R. k. templom (11008. számú műemlék).jpg

File:R. k. templom (11008. számú műemlék).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Iulius Aegidius (talk) 20:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Iharos-Szily-féle sírkápolna (6906. számú műemlék) 2.jpg

Üdvözlettel, Regasterios (talk) 16:31, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

File:DJ Martin.jpg

File:DJ Martin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bencemac (talk) 15:05, 20 February 2021 (UTC)